Subsubsection 1.4.4: MC2H 30 vs Meta (Meta900 prior) 30 Up Subsection 1.4: Correlations Subsubsection 1.4.6: MC2H 100 vs Meta (Meta900 prior) 100 

1.4.5 MC2H 50 vs Meta (Meta900 prior) 50

These are all the same correlation differences, but plotted at different scales. The sampling grid is 100 logaritmically spread.
(a) MC2H [Source]
figure plots/correlations50/mchv1corr50_100.png
(b) Meta [Source]
figure plots/correlations/correlations_meta_ann/meta50corr_100.png
Figure 433 Correlation differences between prior at 100% max scale
(a) MC2H [Source]
figure plots/correlations50/mchv1corr50_20.png
(b) Meta [Source]
figure plots/correlations/correlations_meta_ann/meta50corr_20.png
Figure 434 Correlation differences between prior at 20% max scale
(a) MC2H [Source]
figure plots/correlations50/mchv1corr50_5.png
(b) Meta [Source]
figure plots/correlations/correlations_meta_ann/meta50corr_5.png
Figure 435 Correlation differences between prior at 5% max scale
 Subsubsection 1.4.4: MC2H 30 vs Meta (Meta900 prior) 30 Up Subsection 1.4: Correlations Subsubsection 1.4.6: MC2H 100 vs Meta (Meta900 prior) 100